13 Mar 2026

Banking on a connection

Banking on a connection

Grid connection waiting times were once a minor administrative hurdle; they’re now a major factor in the success – or failure – of renewable energy projects

The primary worry of renewable energy developers today is not the cost of equipment or energy-price volatility, but “the queue”: a  1,700 GW backlog of projects waiting for a grid connection. Capacity constraints on national grids have become a determining financial factor in whether projects can go ahead and where capital can be deployed.

Europe’s electricity grids are not modernising fast enough to accommodate the rapid build-out of renewable capacity. As a result, grid access is becoming a key economic constraint for new projects, affecting development timelines, financing structures and investment decisions.

Bottlenecks across Europe

In some European markets the connection queue has become a major barrier to development. Renewable projects in the United Kingdom may face waits of 10 to 15 years for a grid connection – the longest in Europe. In Ireland, limited interconnection with mainland Europe has pushed connection timelines close to a decade.

Elsewhere, speculative applications are clogging the pipeline. In Italy and Spain, thousands of permit applications for projects unlikely ever to be built have filled connection queues, delaying viable developments. Meanwhile Nordic grids are struggling to keep pace with rising volumes of offshore wind power that must be transmitted long distances to demand centres in southern Sweden and Denmark.

These bottlenecks are slowing Europe’s energy transition. Denmark, for instance, suffered a major setback in late 2024 when a tender for six new wind farms, targeting 6 GW, received no bids. Developers cited untenable commercial risks, partly linked to high grid-connection costs, as the reason for staying away. In January 2026, Germany suspended auctions for offshore wind sites until further notice, citing rising costs and grid-connection concerns.

Without predictable access to grid infrastructure, otherwise viable renewable projects may struggle to secure financing or move ahead.

The economic toll of grid constraints

Grid congestion is increasingly affecting the economics and financing of renewable energy projects.

The most immediate impact comes from connection delays. Renewable projects require most capital to be deployed upfront during construction. When grid connections are postponed, developers may find themselves servicing project debt while the asset is not yet generating revenue. Industry experts estimate that a 12-month delay in commissioning typically costs a standard 50 MW wind or solar project about €2 million in additional costs and lost revenue.

Uncertainty over connection timelines is also influencing how projects are financed. Lenders are charging higher interest rates, shortening loan tenors and scrutinising merchant exposure more closely.

Operational risks can persist even after projects connect to the grid. In Germany, renewable energy plants may gain grid access relatively quickly but then face curtailment due to congestion on transmission networks. These interruptions reduce revenues and must be reflected in power purchase agreements. Almost half of the €7.2 billion in lost electricity sales due to curtailment across Europe in 2024 occurred in Germany.

Connection costs can further complicate project economics. In markets such as the UK and Poland, developers may face “deep” connection charges requiring them to contribute to grid upgrades needed to handle additional capacity. Even in markets with “shallow” connection costs – where developers pay only for the line to the nearest substation – congestion may still limit the ability to deliver electricity reliably.

Adapting to grid constraints

As grid access becomes less predictable, developers and financiers are beginning to adjust how projects are designed and located.

One response has been the growing use of battery energy storage systems (BESS) alongside renewable generation. Although batteries increase project costs, co-located storage can help manage congestion and improve project bankability. Many off-takers now expect storage to be included as part of a power purchase agreement.

Grid constraints are also influencing siting decisions. Developers are paying closer attention to the proximity of substations, even when this means accepting weaker wind or solar resources.

Another strategy is to develop projects close to large electricity users, such as data centres or industrial facilities, incorporating dedicated substations or transmission infrastructure as part of the project.

 
How grid congestion increases project risk
Risk category Pre-2023

2026 reality

PPA risk Focused on price volatility Focused on delivery obligations if projects miss connection dates
Financing risk Lenders look for 15-year stable returns Lenders are charging higher interest rates, shortening loan tenors and scrutinising merchant exposure more closely
Siting risk Developers looked for the sunniest or windiest locations Developers now prioritise proximity to substations, even when this means accepting weaker wind or solar resources

 

De-risking the queue

Grid operators and regulators know they have a problem. They’re tackling it in two ways: by stepping up investment in grid capacity and resilience, and by making the process of accessing connectivity more rational and efficient.

The European Commission’s  Energy Highways initiative is fast-tracking eight key cross-border projects to alleviate connection bottlenecks. EU funding for grid upgrades is budgeted to increase fivefold to nearly €30 billion for the 2028–2034 period. The goal is a complete overhaul of EU grid networks within 10 years – a tall order, given that most of the transmission network is more than 40 years old. The Commission also proposes to slash permitting times to two years for key projects and to override local authorities if they are taking too long over permitting.

The United Kingdom, for its part, has earmarked £10.3 billion to rewire the nation’s high-voltage electricity network – the biggest expansion of the grid since the 1960s.

One project that has been on the drawing board for decades, a new undersea cable that will double the “energy highway” between France and Spain, is expected to be ready by 2028. This link will also end the Iberian Peninsula’s isolation from the EU energy market – a major step for regional integration. Other projects may take longer. In the Baltics, says one EU official, permitting has slowed due to security concerns following the sabotage of undersea cables.

Among institutional lenders, the European Investment Bank stepped up lending for grids and storage to a record €11.6 billion in 2025, nearly triple the level of 2023. One priority, in addition to building out new grid infrastructure, is to strengthen grid cybersecurity and other forms of digital resilience, such as the ability to react rapidly to sudden changes in demand.

Many countries are also moving away from “first-come, first-served” towards a “first-ready, first-connected” model to clear out speculative projects. To move developments away from congested areas, Poland is publishing maps indicating grid availability that carry a warning: new projects in congested zones are unlikely to win approval.

Grid operators are also exploring ways to increase capacity on existing networks. Utilities in countries including Belgium and the Netherlands are installing advanced conductors that allow significantly greater power flows without building entirely new infrastructure – a process known as reconductoring.

Can grids upgrade fast enough?

Investment momentum to modernise national grids is finally gathering pace after years of neglect. Expanded grid capacity, improved queue management and greater interconnection could gradually reduce some of the risks that currently constrain renewable energy development.

The question is whether earmarked funds will flow fast enough to significantly help the development pipeline. Some analysts believe investment in grid networks will fall short of what’s needed. Allianz estimates the distribution network alone needs €220 billion by 2030. The insurer says interconnector and storage capacity must double by 2030 to stabilise and optimise European grids – an investment requiring €10 billion a year.

Even with these efforts, grid access is likely to remain a key constraint for renewable developers in the near term. For developers and investors, that means adapting to a new reality in which grid availability shapes project design, financing structures and investment decisions.

To join the discussion on grid constraints and their impact on renewable project finance, register for updates about the Solar + Wind Finance & Investment Summit Europe in Barcelona, 28 September – 1 October.

 

Loading